The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
A Bridge Blog
Assigning blame since April 20, 2007

Vendredi

Print the article

This entry was posted on 7/20/2007 11:45 PM and is filed under General.

Had a 3/4 set with Jeff tonight.  It went alright except for one hand.  You pick up in 3rd at unfavorable:

K9643 / - / K9876 / QT7

Pard passes and Righty opens 1 Heart.

...

C'mon now, am I really supposed to pass with this hand?  With any other partner I would have bid 2 Hearts in a heartbeat.  With Jeff it took about 15 seconds (we promise an opening bid red) after deciding I'd pull any penalty double he made below the 5 level.  Yes you're at unfavorable, but voids are huge on offense and to me not bidding this hand borders on criminal.

Of course I got the nightmare auction.  4 Hearts on my left, double by Jeff, pass to me.

Any other partner I'd pass proudly with my scattered defensive values but once I've promised an opening hand, is this really enough to sit?  Is running gonna make it worse?

I ran, whipped, sticks and wheels, sitting would have been not as bad (-590).  Jeff wouldn't and couldn't have doubled without the agreement (he had a thin but acceptable double opposite an opening hand: A8 / JT87 / QJ3 / 8643.) 

Bottom line it was really stupid of me to violate our agreement.  The way to get Jeff to see the light is to get bad results from playing it, not to get bad results from breaking system.  -1100 was 13 IMPs away (-590 was 6 IMPs away.)  That was the only board we lost more than 2 IMPs.

What else happened this week?  Booked my flight to Boston.  Wished I was in Nashville (I'm so Jonesin' to take a last minute road trip.)  The Dems tried to show voters that the reason we're still in Iraq is Shrub and the Banana Republicans by pulling an all-nighter to try to get the wingnuts to agree to allow a vote on a timetable to get out.  No dice.  I'll probably change my banner to John Edwards soon.  I admire Ron Paul, but Edwards has about a 5% shot and Ron Paul has about a .5% shot, so I'm gonna be practical and go with the candidate I like who has a shot instead of the candidate I really like who doesn't.

Followed the final table of the World Series of Poker.  It came down to an American against a Canadian.  The Canadian had no clue how to play heads up (way too passive) but that didn't stop him from winning a few million dollars, which is a tad more than I can say.

Oh, I also saw a great speech by Julia Sweeney this week on CSpan.  She's that chick who did the character Pat on SNL for many years (you couldn't tell if Pat was a chick or a dude.)  She was talking about how she came to be an atheist.  She was very eloquent and entertaining.  For a long time I was a 'live and let live' atheist but as the wingnuts get nuttier (trying to take over the government and impose their views on society) I get less and less tolerant of superstitious nonsense and people who espouse it.

Might as well sign off there.  Next Friday will be here soon.



 
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 7/21/2007 4:08 PM Jeff wrote:
      Passing would have been criminal with this hand, but whats wrong with 1S?
      Reply to this
    • 7/21/2007 5:52 PM Jonathan Ferguson wrote:
      I considered 1 Spade but how many hands are you not going to hang me opposite a red on white overcall that you are going to hang me opposite an 'opening hand' Michaels?

      It's funny how in takeout double vs overcall decisions you tend to bend over backwards to make a takeout double, but here you want me to call this hand a Spade single suiter when Spades isn't even my best suit and I have a call available to show a 2 suiter.

      It's a Catch-22. What makes the hand a mandatory bid is the 2 half-decent suits (coupled with the void in opps suit.) But I can't make the bid that shows a 2 suiter because of a systemic agreement.

      One thing (okay, the only thing) pass has going for it is that declarer will never play me for this hand.
      Reply to this
      1. 7/21/2007 10:28 PM Norm Houle wrote:
        Breaking a partnership agreement often results in bad results. Having bad partnership agreements does it even more. The best way is to play by agreement, and insist a lot on the bad results, hoping to change the agreement. This can be very hard when the people concerned are Jonathan and Jeff. I guess you have to take the good with the bad...
        Reply to this
    Leave a comment

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.